Trump-Russia probe

Deadline: White House provided MSNBC late Wednesday afternoon with only the third mention of the bombshell revelation from Special Counsel John Durham on alleged spying against the Trump campaign and early presidency, but they predictably used 16 minutes and 10 seconds to dismiss it as “dangerous disinformation” peddled by “right-wing media.”

On Tuesday's Morning Joe, host Joe Scarborough said that anyone who cared about Special Counsel John Durham's latest filing "stupid." On Thursday, he upped the name-calling even further, saying only "complete, total asses" care about Durham. For Scarborough, this includes Durham himself.

Two days after Principal Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre ducked questions from Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich about the bombshell filing in the John Durham investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, Heinrich posed the same questions to Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Wednesday and, not surprisingly, she received the same result.

Unlike other late night talk show hosts, ABC's Jimmy Kimmel actually covered the latest news from Special Counsel John Durham on his Tuesday show, but he only did so to mock those who actually care about the allegations.

No one can ever claim that the notion of Trump-Russia collusion and the Mueller investigation were downplayed or ignored by the press. It was the opposite. The story was enormous and incessant. Special counsel John Durham is the Anti-Mueller. Nothing he finds is considered newsworthy.

With the liberal media either downplaying the bombshell revelations from Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the Russia collusion hoax, raging at them, or just plain ignoring them, it’s worth looking back at how they used to celebrate his investigations. Because back in 2008, they had high hopes for his investigation into then-President George W. Bush’s CIA after interrogation…

On Tuesday morning, MSNBC finally got around to covering Special Counsel John Durham's latest filing that revealed Democratic operatives obtained internet data from the Executive Office of the President and other Donald Trump-related entities in an attempt to spin the Russian collusion narrative. Unfortunately, both dismissed it with MSNBC's Morning Joe treating it as a Benghazi-like…

Will we see members of the leftist media that most vociferously PUSHED the Russia collusion hoax, attack the Clinton camp with the same volume? Don’t bet on it. The following is a look at some of the most over-the-top instances of liberal journos attempting to bring down former President Trump with disproven claims of an election collusion with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

Over the weekend, a "bombshell" was released by special counsel John Durham, revealing the Clinton campaign was spying on Donald Trump (even into his White House years). The networks and major papers avoided touching this news like Durham was a leper.

Since the so-called “fact first” Cable News Network was busy ignoring the bombshell report from Special Counsel John Durham finding evidence the Clinton campaign was spying on then-President Trump, they needed to fill their airtime with SOMETHING. That’s why they called up chief media reporter Brian Stelter to defend Whoopi Goldberg (stage name) and suggested it was the “wrong answer” for ABC…

After the network Sunday shows all censored the shocking revelations from special prosecutor John Durham’s investigation that the Hillary Clinton campaign spied on Donald Trump’s campaign and presidency, Monday’s network morning shows maintained the deafening silence. Instead, the NBC, ABC, and CBS broadcasts spent over eight minutes covering the Russian skating scandal at the Olympics.

Reporter Daniel Victor ran an embarrassing expose on….Elf on the Shelf in Sunday’s New York Times. “In a Tiny, Jolly Spy for Santa, Watchdogs Spot Big Brother.” But behind the silliness lurks a liberal bias. In the Biden Administration, the New York Times is abruptly rediscovering liberal virtues like free speech and privacy, concepts it denigrated for years in the quest of…

Before coronavirus and before impeachment, Russian collusion was the hottest topic in the media and they never grew weary of hyping it, even as it fell apart.

Charlie Savage, national security and legal policy correspondent for the New York Times, played defense on behalf of the now-discredited “Steele dossier” that led to the first Trump impeachment, in Thursday’s “Discredited Steele Dossier Doesn't Undercut Russia Inquiry.” The infamous tissue of rumors and lies that would foster the false “collusion”-with-Russia narrative was put…