The taxpayer-funded PBS News Hour on Monday evening offered yet another one-sided take on a fiercely contested ideological issue: The Supreme Court’s striking down of racial preferences in college admissions. Host Amna Nawaz’s guest was a UCLA doctor and racial activist.
Together, they decried the Supreme Court and schemed for ways to work around the decision, including the possibly dangerous step of lowering standards to get into medical school.
Nawaz: Doctors, nurses, hospitals and many others are concerned about how the Supreme Court's ruling striking down affirmative action in college admissions could affect the medical profession. Currently, just 5.7 percent of all doctors in the U.S. are Black, and nearly 7 percent are Hispanic, while 64 percent are white. Black and Latino applicants still make up a small percentage of those who go to medical school. And there's worry about what this ruling could mean for the pipeline of who eventually provides health care.
For more on those concerns, I'm joined by Dr. Utibe Essien. He's an internal medicine physician and assistant professor of medicine at UCLA. Dr. Essien, welcome, and thanks for joining us. Before we get into the details of the ruling, I just have to ask, what was your initial reaction when you first heard the Supreme Court's ruling?
Essien didn’t disappoint, calling the news “pretty much a gut punch. And it was really devastating to see that, despite years of proof that affirmative action does improve diversity in undergraduate and medical schools, that the court has decided to let go of this decision….”
Nawaz hyped up some figures to justify her alarmism.
Nawaz: Just to underscore some of those numbers, when you look at the 2022 and 2023 school year, in terms of first-year enrollees and medical school, these are the numbers we have. Black students made up just 10 percent of first-year medical students. Latino students made up just 12 percent of medical school students….
The black population is around 14% of the U.S. population, which makes 10% not such an alarming figure.
Nawaz: Help us understand that a little better, though. In medical -- in the medical field, in particular, why is that diversity of doctors so important in terms of providing health care?
Essien: Absolutely. I think it's important to realize this is not just a moral imperative, the right thing to do, but that diversity really does save lives….
Nawaz didn’t question the obsessive racial bean-counting, but pressed her liberal guest on how medical schools can get around the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Nawaz: So, what now, Dr. Essien? We're in a post-affirmative action America. What specific steps can institutions take to still work towards that same diversity in medical schools and the medical profession?
Essien’s idea? Downplay MCAT scores and grade point average, in favor of a “holistic review" approach to medical school admissions, which frankly sounds dangerous. Would you necessarily prefer treatment from a doctor who got in via racial preference?
Essien: …..We have to ensure that those who are reviewing applications actually are anti-racist in their approach and are able to capture the full breadth of our students' journeys to go in towards medicine….
This biased segment was brought to you in part by Consumer Cellular.
A transcript is available, click “Expand” to read:
PBS NewsHour
July 10, 2023
6:28:31 p.m. (ET)
Amna Nawaz: Doctors, nurses, hospitals and many others are concerned about how the Supreme Court's ruling striking down affirmative action in college admissions could affect the medical profession. Currently, just 5.7 percent of all doctors in the U.S. are Black, and nearly 7 percent are Hispanic, while 64 percent are white. Black and Latino applicants still make up a small percentage of those who go to medical school. And there's worry about what this ruling could mean for the pipeline of who eventually provides health care.
For more on those concerns, I'm joined by Dr. Utibe Essien. He's an internal medicine physician and assistant professor of medicine at UCLA. Dr. Essien, welcome, and thanks for joining us. Before we get into the details of the ruling, I just have to ask, what was your initial reaction when you first heard the Supreme Court's ruling?
Dr. Utibe Essien, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA: Absolutely. Thanks so much for having me, Amna. And, sadly, while we were expecting this news, it was pretty much a gut punch. And it was really devastating to see that, despite years of proof that affirmative action does improve diversity in undergraduate and medical schools, that the court has decided to let go of this decision. And so, I was pretty devastated on Thursday. I know a lot of my friends and colleagues were as well.
Amna Nawaz: So, those numbers we just mentioned in the introduction, that was even with affirmative action in place. Why are those numbers so low? Help us understand.
Dr. Utibe Essien: So, it's really important to appreciate that this is not just at random, right? A paper that my colleagues and I published led by one of my friends, Dr. Fais (ph), showed that some of the reasons for the low numbers are related to just the journey towards applying to medical school, so higher rates of pre-medical school loans and less likelihood to be able to pay for the preparatory materials to be able to get into medical school, and even having parents who are less likely to have a college education. Some of these are factors are what drives Black and Hispanic and Native American lower rates of physicians, much less some of the systemic and structural challenges that we have around education here in the U.S.
Amna Nawaz: Just to underscore some of those numbers, when you look at the 2022 and 2023 school year, in terms of first-year enrollees and medical school, these are the numbers we have. Black students made up just 10 percent of first-year medical students. Latino students made up just 12 percent of medical school students.
But Dr. Essien, a few states, we should point out, had already banned affirmative action at the state level. Did you see an impact in terms of that in those states, in terms of who ends up going to medical school and diversity of those classes?
Dr. Utibe Essien: Absolutely. So, we're here in California, I am, rather. And they banned affirmative action back in 1996. And we have seen that, here in California, the rates of Black and Hispanic individuals going into undergraduate and medical schools really significantly dropped since that ruling in '96. We had a paper that came out last year that showed, not just here in California, but in seven other states that had affirmative action bans, the number of individuals from minoritized groups continues to drop in medical schools.
And so, we have precedents for what is going to happen now that this is federal policy and not national — not just state policy, and it's really devastating for the future of the health of our communities.
Amna Nawaz: Help us understand that a little better, though. In medical — in the medical field, in particular, why is that diversity of doctors so important in terms of providing health care?
Dr. Utibe Essien: Absolutely. I think it's important to realize this is not just a moral imperative, the right thing to do, but that diversity really does save lives. We have studies that show that having a doctor who looks like you, it makes you more likely to take preventive screenings such as flu vaccines, or more likely to go for more invasive procedures like heart catheterizations.
And in a study published back in April, it showed that, for every 10 percent of increase in Black primary care doctors within a county, there's a 30-day increase in life expectancy for Black individuals. So, again, literally having diverse doctors saves lives. And my concern is that this policy, this decision is going to take us backwards.
Amna Nawaz: So, what now, Dr. Essien? We're in a post-affirmative action America. What specific steps can institutions take to still work towards that same diversity in medical schools and the medical profession?
Dr. Utibe Essien: It's a question we're all asking right now. There are three things that my colleagues and I kind of put forth in op-ed last week around this. And the first is really strengthening holistic review, really focusing on the journey that our patients — or our students, rather, take towards becoming physicians, and not wholly focused on the MCAT scores, that test that we have taken to get into medical school, or their GPAs. We have to ensure that those who are reviewing applications actually are anti-racist in their approach and are able to capture the full breadth of our students' journeys to go in towards medicine. And, lastly, we have to eliminate some of the economic costs. That test that I mentioned earlier, it costs $320 to take to get into medical school. The cost of medical school itself is exorbitant. I left school with $250,000 worth of loans. And those are some of the steps that we need to take to be able to increase the diversity of our medical schools.
Amna Nawaz: In the few seconds, I have to — I have to ask, what's your greatest concern if this problem isn't addressed?
Dr. Utibe Essien: You know, as I mentioned, we have a disparities issue in our country. We didn't just see that with COVID. But, over the last year, we see a seven-year gap between life expectancy in white Americans and Black Americans. My worry is that that gap is going to widen in this post-affirmative action world. And I hope that we will be able to advocate for the reversal of some of these policies that were just made.
